A principal stratification approach to assess the differences in prognosis between cancers caused by hormone replacement therapy and by other factors

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Several recent studies have reported that women who have used hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and developed breast cancer, tend to have a better prognosis than women with breast cancer who have not used HRT. One possible explanation is that tumors caused by HRT are more benign than tumors caused by other factors. Although it is relevant to quantify differences in prognostic factors across subtypes of breast cancer, it is not obvious how to do this correctly. This is because the tumors which occur among women who are treated with HRT are a mixture of HRT-induced and other tumors. We propose a framework based on principal stratification to distinguish women with HRT-induced tumors from women with tumors caused by other factors. To estimate the difference in prognosis for these two groups, we propose two estimation methods, which can be used under both cohort and case-control sampling schemes. Copyright © 2010 The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sjolander, A., Vansteelandt, S., & Humphreys, K. (2010). A principal stratification approach to assess the differences in prognosis between cancers caused by hormone replacement therapy and by other factors. International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free