Pragmatic trials of complex psychosocial interventions: Methodological challenges

6Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Having first introduced the pragmatic health care trial, the discussion then focuses on a selected list of technical problems that are important for the design, analysis and inference from such trials. The first is lack of independence of participants' outcomes do to clustering either arising from a cluster randomized design or to the way treatment is delivered (therapist and group effects). The second and third concern the implications of non-adherence to treatment and subsequent loss to follow-up, particularly, when non-adherence is associated with missing outcome data. Finally, it is argued that pragmatism and a desire for a scientific explanation should not be regarded as mutually exclusive. Copyright © 2013 Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dunn, G. (2013, June). Pragmatic trials of complex psychosocial interventions: Methodological challenges. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796013000048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free