Methodological proposal for the construction and selection of digital high-precision elevation models

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Digital Elevation Models improve accuracy in terrain analysis. This work compared different interpolation methods using statistical criteria in a topographic survey of 339 points raised with a total station in the “San Juan de Lagunillas” area (Venezuela). The existence of a significant trend process with spatial autocorrelation modeled by an isotropic Gaussian semivariogram was documented. The kriging allowed to obtain residuals less than a minimum tolerable error equal to 0.1 m. The residual kriging was the best evaluated in cross validation with exclusion (absolute mean error of 0.71 m). The disjunctive kriging showed a lower error average but a wider error range and the highest mean absolute error (12.8 m). The other kriging showed mean error variance greater than 1.3 m and absolute minimum errors greater than 0.85 m. Due to the high dependence on the model specification form, graphics are recommended for a better fit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrades, J., Cuesta, L., Camargo, C., López, J., Torres, H., & Osorio, A. (2020). Methodological proposal for the construction and selection of digital high-precision elevation models. Colombia Forestal, 23(2), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.14483/2256201X.15155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free