Explaining Sustainable Architecture

Abstract

Often, we are faced with comments, such as sustainable architecture cannot be defined, we do not know what it means, or it means everything and nothing. However, what are the implications for the architectural profession if we are not able to articulate what it is, we do. The consequences of our professional lexicon go beyond being a matter of academic interest. Precise terminology in practice, especially in the early design stages and briefing process is critical, as decisions taken rely on all actors to 'speak the same language.' This paper presents the outcome of one of a series of studies which were developed to explore this topic. This extensive literature (content) analysis, gathers information on what sustainable architecture means and how it impacts both discourse and practice. In much of the literature examined, there is a tendency within the introduction for authors to define sustainable architecture, acknowledge that it cannot be defined, or articulate that there is not one agreed-upon definition. There is an apparent dichotomy of definitions, understandings, terminology, and language which, are all valid. This is evident through the distinct transition in terminology; development of meanings; as well as the establishment that there are multiple understandings which are person-specific. This dichotomy has potential value in that it maintains the broadness, which allows for innovative thinking and diverse responses while also acknowledging various individuals and ways of practising sustainable architecture. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the challenges concerning the lexicon of sustainable architecture; how it is defined in literature and research; as well as how that may impact the profession in the context of the current climate emergency.