Comparison of patient simulation methods used in a physical assessment course

21Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether there is a difference in student pharmacists' learning or satisfaction when standardized patients or manikins are used to teach physical assessment. Design. Third-year student pharmacists were randomized to learn physical assessment (cardiac and pulmonary examinations) using either a standardized patient or a manikin. Assessment. Performance scores on the final examination and satisfaction with the learning method were compared between groups. Eighty and 74 student pharmacists completed the cardiac and pulmonary examinations, respectively. There was no difference in performance scores between student pharmacists who were trained using manikins vs standardized patients (93.8% vs. 93.5%, p=0.81). Student pharmacists who were trained using manikins indicated that they would have probably learned to perform cardiac and pulmonary examinations better had they been taught using standardized patients (p<0.001) and that they were less satisfied with their method of learning (p=0.04). Conclusions. Training using standardized patients and manikins are equally effective methods of learning physical assessment, but student pharmacists preferred using standardized patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grice, G. R., Wenger, P., Brooks, N., & Berry, T. M. (2013). Comparison of patient simulation methods used in a physical assessment course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77477

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free