Discourses of change: The shift from infibulation to sunna circumcision among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway

3Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Somali and Sudanese transnational discourses on female genital cutting (FGC) center on a shift from infibulation to sunna circumcision, a change perceived to reduce health risks and accommodate religious teaching, yet this shift is far less extensive and substantial than its typical portrayal suggests. Based on data from interviews and focus group discussions with 95 migrants of Somali and Sudanese origin, in this paper, I explore these migrants’ discourses of change and how and why they seem blurred and contradictory. Most participants described the ongoing abandonment of infibulation and uptake of sunna circumcision in terms of civilization, modernization and transition toward a more correct Islam; however, their perceptions of the anatomical extents and religious and cultural meanings of sunna circumcision appeared blurred and contradictory. We suggest that these blurred and contradictory perceptions of sunna circumcision enable the study’s participants to maneuver in a context of opposing and changing social norms regarding FGC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johansen, R. E. B. (2022). Discourses of change: The shift from infibulation to sunna circumcision among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. PLoS ONE, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free