The fuss over lipo“fuss”cin: not all autofluorescence is the same

14Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the first description of cellular auto-fluorescence over a century ago, we have now come to appreciate that autofluorescence should not be discarded as a biological artifact but embraced as a biological phenomenon with potentially important cellular relevance. Indeed, cellular and tissue autofluorescence has been attributed to a spectrum of unrelated molecules such as porphyrins, vitamins (vita-min A, riboflavin, thiamine), structural pro-teins, lipofuscin and ceroid pigments. We have recently shown that freshly isolated epithelial cancer stem cells (CSCs) bear autofluorescent vesicles in the cytoplasm. Our studies defini-tively prove that riboflavin and not lipofuscin is the source of autofluorescence in CSCs as the inhibition of ATP and not autophagy eliminates CSC autofluorescence, that the ATP-dependent transporter ABCG2, for which riboflavin is a substrate, is overexpressed in autofluorescent CSCs and co-localizes with the membrane of intracellular autofluorescent vesicles, the ABCG2-specific inhibitor Fumitremorgin C reversibly eliminates CSC autofluorescence, riboflavin is a substrate for ABCG2, and only the addition of riboflavin to vitamin-deprived CSC cultures is capable of restoring autofluorescence. Thus, the sum of these data unequivocally supports the conclu-sion that the source of CSC autofluorescence is the vitamin riboflavin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sainz, B., Miranda-Lorenzo, I., & Heeschen, C. (2015). The fuss over lipo“fuss”cin: not all autofluorescence is the same. European Journal of Histochemistry, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/EJH.2015.2512

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free