Lyme disease: A search for a causative agent in ticks in south-eastern Australia

42Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Attempts were made to identify the causative organism of Lyme disease in Australia from possible tick vectors. Ticks were collected in coastal areas of New South Wales, Australia, from localities associated with putative human infections. The ticks were dissected; a portion of the gut contents was examined for spirochaetes by microscopy, the remaining portion inoculated into culture media. The detection of spirochaetes in culture was performed using microscopy, and immunochemical and molecular (PCR) techniques. Additionally, whole ticks were tested with PCR for spirochaetes. From 1990 to 1992, approximately 12000 ticks were processed for spirochaetes. No evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi or any other spirochaete was recovered from or detected in likely tick vectors. Some spirochaete-like objects detected in the cultures were shown to be artifacts, probably aggregates of bacterial flagellae. There is no definitive evidence for the existence in Australia of B. burgdorferi the causative agent of true Lyme disease, or for any other tick-borne spirochaete that may be responsible for a local syndrome being reported as Lyme disease. © 1994, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Russell, R. C., Doggett, S. L., Munro, R., Ellis, J., Avery, D., Hunt, C., & Dickeson, D. (1994). Lyme disease: A search for a causative agent in ticks in south-eastern Australia. Epidemiology and Infection, 112(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800057782

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free