Differences in neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury in varying animal models and humans

68Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rats have been the primary model to study the process and underlying mechanisms of recovery after spinal cord injury. Two weeks after a severe spinal cord contusion, rats can regain weight-bearing abilities without therapeutic interventions, as assessed by the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan locomotor scale. However, many human patients suffer from permanent loss of motor function following spinal cord injury. While rats are the most understood animal model, major differences in sensorimotor pathways between quadrupeds and bipeds need to be considered. Understanding the major differences between the sensorimotor pathways of rats, non-human primates, and humans is a start to improving targets for treatments of human spinal cord injury. This review will discuss the neuroplasticity of the brain and spinal cord after spinal cord injury in rats, non-human primates, and humans. A brief overview of emerging interventions to induce plasticity in humans with spinal cord injury will also be discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Filipp, M., Travis, B., Henry, S., Idzikowski, E., Magnuson, S., Loh, M., … Hanna, A. (2019). Differences in neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury in varying animal models and humans. Neural Regeneration Research. Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.243694

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free