Brief communication: Comparing hydrological and hydrogeomorphic paradigms for global flood hazard mapping

24Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Global floodplain mapping has rapidly progressed over the past few years. Different methods have been proposed to identify areas prone to river flooding, resulting in a plethora of available products. Here we assess the potential and limitations of two main paradigms and provide guidance on the use of these global products in assessing flood risk in data-poor regions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Baldassarre, G., Nardi, F., Annis, A., Odongo, V., Rusca, M., & Grimaldi, S. (2020). Brief communication: Comparing hydrological and hydrogeomorphic paradigms for global flood hazard mapping. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(5), 1415–1419. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1415-2020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free