The effect of power and space on foreign diplomatic presence in the United States: A spatial modeling approach

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article explains the variations in foreign diplomatic presence in the U.S. from 1980 to 2000 as a function of the national capabilities of and spatial relationship among nations. We decompose spatial effect into three measures: spatial proximity, spatial dependence, and spatial heterogeneity. We found significant spatial dependence both in the diplomatic interaction and capabilities of nations. Spatial variation in foreign diplomatic presence was adequately explained by national capabilities of U.S. diplomatic partners from 1980 to 1992. However, after 1992, international power distribution alone could no longer fully explain the spatial variations in the foreign diplomatic presence in the U.S. Spatial effect must be taken into account when explaining the variations in the foreign diplomatic presence in the U.S. © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

References Powered by Scopus

373Citations
102Readers
Get full text
140Citations
196Readers

This article is free to access.

Presidential address in search of synthesis

60Citations
9Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

GIS-based borderlands modeling and understanding: A perspective

5Citations
24Readers

Borderlands modelling and understanding with GISS: Challenges and research agenda

3Citations
6Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xierali, I. M., & Liu, L. (2006). The effect of power and space on foreign diplomatic presence in the United States: A spatial modeling approach. Geographic Information Sciences, 12(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824000609480618

Readers over time

‘13‘16‘19‘20‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

57%

Computer Science 1

14%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0