Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial

12Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Clinical trials are normally performed with well-known brands of glass ionomer cement (GIC), but the cost of these materials is high for public healthcare in less-affluent communities. Given the need to research cheaper materials, it seems pertinent to investigate the retention rate of a low-cost GIC applied as atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants in two centers in Brazil. Four hundred and thirty-seven 6-to-8-year-old schoolchildren were selected in two cities in Brazil. The children were randomly divided into two groups, according to the tested GIC applied in the first permanent molars. The retention rate was evaluated after 3, 6 and 12 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed. The variables were tested for association with sealant longevity, using logistic regression analyses (α = 5%). The retention rate of sealants after 12 months was 19.1%. The high-cost GIC brand presented a 2-fold-more-likely-to-survive rate than the low-cost brand (p < 0.001). Significant difference was also found between the cities where the treatments were performed, in that Barueri presented a higher sealant survival rate than Recife (p < 0.001). The retention rate of a low-cost GIC sealant brand was markedly lower than that of a well-known GIC sealant brand.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hesse, D., Bonifácio, C. C., Guglielmi, C. D. A. B., da Franca, C., Mendes, F. M., & Raggio, D. P. (2015). Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Oral Research, 29(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free