Inclusion is not enough: a qualitative study of leadership, ethos, and policy in racially heterogeneous schools in NI

1Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In Northern Ireland (NI), where the education system has historically been shaped by religious and cultural divisions, recent demographic shifts due to inward migration present both challenges and opportunities for educational leaders. While research reveals the crucial role of leaders in promoting inclusivity [Miller, P. 2019. “Race and Ethnicity in Educational Leadership.” In Principles of Educational Leadership and Management, edited by T. Bush, L. Bell, and D. Middlewood, 223–238. SAGE Publications.], little is known about how leaders in different school types, particularly those with limited prior exposure to racial heterogeneity, interpret these changes. Drawing on debates in multicultural education (MCE), we examine how leaders in a Catholic and a State-Controlled post-primary school, alongside policy workers, respond to racial diversity. Findings from 12 qualitative interviews show that while leaders are supportive of minority ethnic students (MES), responses are often intuitive rather than evidence-based, reflecting gaps in professional development and systemic constraints. The paper highlights the role of school ethos in shaping leadership responses. An ethos that makes a rhetorical commitment to inclusion without meaningful implementation embeds systemic inequities. By situating leadership of schools with MES within a complex web of ethos and policy, this study moves beyond prescriptive leadership models, advocating for a nuanced, critically engaged, and contextually responsive approach to educational leadership in NI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donnelly, C., McAuley, C., & Hubbard, L. (2025). Inclusion is not enough: a qualitative study of leadership, ethos, and policy in racially heterogeneous schools in NI. School Leadership and Management, 45(4), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2025.2546089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free