Abstract
The provision of flood safety is of paramount importance in densely populated deltaic regions. The Dutch rely on flood defences to protect their lives and livelihoods from large-scale floods. The paper "Changing estuaries, changing views" (Smits et al., Hydrobiologica 565:339-355, 2006) criticizes this strategy and presents an alternative that could be summarized as a proposal to leave deltas untouched and to rely on natural sedimentation to reduce the impact of floods. It seems questionable, however, whether such a strategy will often be compatible with population pressures and efforts to stimulate economic growth. Moreover, it presupposes morphological conditions that seem highly unrealistic, not just in the Netherlands but also in many other sediment-starved coastal systems. Other than recommending countries not to implement the Dutch flood protection strategy and to leave deltas untouched, it should be recommended that solutions be tailored to local circumstances. The choice of a flood protection strategy should be based on a balanced evaluation of alternatives, including a realistic assessment of physical conditions. © 2008 The Author(s).
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jongejan, R. B., Vrijling, J. K., Stive, M. J. F., & Jonkman, S. N. (2008, June). A comment on “changing estuaries, changing views.” Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9363-7
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.