Comparison of subsequent infection in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers between ST72 community-genotype and hospital genotypes: A retrospective cohort study

2Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important risk factor of subsequent infection. The purpose of our study was to compare the rates of subsequent infection among newly-admitted patients carrying MRSA between community-genotype and hospital-genotypes Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the rates of subsequent MRSA infection, time to subsequent infection and mortality in the following 6 months between the community-genotype ST72 MRSA cohort and the hospital-genotypes ST5 / ST239 MRSA cohort. Results: We identified 198 patients carrying ST72 and 156 patients carrying ST5 or ST239. There was no difference in the rates of subsequent infection between ST72 cohort and ST5 / ST239 cohort (13.1% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.931). The median time to development of subsequent infection was not significantly different (27 days vs. 88 days; P = 0.0877). The Kaplan-Meier method showed no difference in the cumulative rate of being free of subsequent infection between the cohorts (P = 0.9209). Overall mortality rates at 6 months did not differ (1.5% vs. 1.9%; P = 1.000) Conclusions: We found no evidence that rates of subsequent MRSA infection were different between newly-admitted patients carrying community-genotype ST72 MRSA and those whom carrying hospital-genotypes ST5 or ST239 MRSA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, S. Y., Chung, D. R., Kang, Y. R., Kim, S. H., Cho, S. Y., Ha, Y. E., … Song, J. H. (2017). Comparison of subsequent infection in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers between ST72 community-genotype and hospital genotypes: A retrospective cohort study. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0220-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free