Ce que les science studies font à la science politique. Réponse à Bruno Latour

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the previous number of the Revue française de science politique, Bruno Latour proposes that science studies and political science unite their efforts to work on common objects according to a renewed approach of "science" and "politics". Pierre Favre answers these propositions by granting at first to the author that both disciplines have numerous objects of study in common, even if certain perspectives diverge outstandingly. But he refuses to follow Latour on the major presuppositions of his approach. He disputes the assertion of Latour according to which we cannot distinguish "science" and "politics" which would have no different domains. He disagrees with the Latour conception of a science finally deprived of any cognitive capacity. To follow this extreme version of science studies, political science would not be scientific any more. Latour does not seem itself to be able to apply its own program, actually self-refuting. © 2008 Presses de Sciences Po.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Favre, P. (2008, November 14). Ce que les science studies font à la science politique. Réponse à Bruno Latour. Revue Francaise de Science Politique. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.585.0817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free