Final Comments

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this study I have shown that popular measures of residential segregation – the dissimilarity index (D), the gini index (G), the separation index (S), Theil’s index (H), and Hutchens’ index (R), a measure closely related to Atkinson’s index (A) – can be cast as group differences of means on residential outcomes (y) scored from area group proportions (p). This approach yields identical results as previous approaches to calculating index scores, so nothing is lost when adopting this formulation – all past research findings can be reproduced and replicated. Importantly, however, many benefits accrue from adopting the new approach to assessing segregation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fossett, M. (2017). Final Comments. In Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis (Vol. 42, pp. 281–284). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41304-4_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free