Characterization in vitro of new bacterial strains showing potentially probiotic crossed effect against vibriosis in relevant fish species for marine aquaculture

7Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Intensive fish farms are often affected by different organisms that produce infectious diseases. To control this situation, antibiotics have been used with negative repercussions for the environment and health. As an alternative to this, probiotics are used that show more effective and respectful results with the environment. The aim of this project is to obtain new potentially probiotic strains against one of the most relevant pathogens of marine aquaculture, vibrios. These bacterial strains were isolated from the gills and intestines of European seabass, meagre and common sole. Later, were evaluated in vitro against 6 pathogenic strains of the genus Vibrio to demonstrate the production of antagonistic effects, production of antibacterial substances, resistance to bile, resistance to pH gradients, adhesion and growth to mucus, competition for nutrients and hydrophobicity. A total of 156 bacterial strains were isolated, but only 7 strains of the genera Alcaligenes, Pseudomonas, Shewanella and Proteus, showed excellent in vitro results to be considered as candidates to be reevaluated by in vivo tests, to determine their harmlessness and protective effect after challenge, and elucidating in future studies their use as possible probiotic strains for aquaculture, highlighting the results obtained with the strain Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. faecalis-1.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gutiérrez-Falcón, A., Padilla, D., Ramos Sosa, M. J., Martín Barrasa, J. L., Acosta-Hernández, B., Sánchez Henao, A., … Real, F. (2020). Characterization in vitro of new bacterial strains showing potentially probiotic crossed effect against vibriosis in relevant fish species for marine aquaculture. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 48(1), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1844714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free