Discussion: Reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data

736Citations
Citations of this article
344Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The definitive paper by Stuiver and Polach (1977) established the conventions for reporting of radiocarbon data for chronological and geophysical studies based on the radioactive decay of 14C in the sample since the year of sample death or formation. Several ways of reporting 14C activity levels relative to a standard were also established, but no specific instructions were given for reporting nuclear weapons-testing (post-bomb) 14C levels in samples. Because the use of postbomb 14C is becoming more prevalent in forensics, biology, and geosciences, a convention needs to be adopted. We advocate the use of fraction modern with a new symbol F14C to prevent confusion with the previously used Fm, which may or may not have been fractionation-corrected. We also discuss the calibration of post-bomb 14C samples and the available data sets and compilations, but do not give a recommendation for a particular data set. © 2004 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reimer, P. J., Brown, T. A., & Reimer, R. W. (2004). Discussion: Reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon, 46(3), 1299–1304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free