Unified Data Modelling and Document Standardization Using Core Components Technical Specification for Electronic Government Applications

23Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the effort of Governments worldwide to effectively transform manual into electronic services, semantic interoperability issues pose as a key challenge: system-to-system interaction asks for standardized data definitions, codification of existing unstructured information and a framework for managing governmental data in a unified way. Integrating and extending recent developments in Germany, Hong-Kong, UK and US governments - but also eBusiness interoperability research results in Europe, the proposed approach is applied within the Greek e-Government Framework and bears the following steps: (a) Gathering and analysis of governmental service forms at field level, so that common structures can be identified, (b) Customization of UN/CEFACT Core Components, (c) Semiautomatic XML Schema Definition (XSD) files creation, using sets of naming, structuring and verification rules, (d) Adoption of international or development of country-specific Codelists, (e) Development of guidance material for the application of the approach by government officials at central or local level. Discussion on the results is targeting best practice examples that can be drawn at scientific and organizational level, but also the key difficulties that have to be tackled - in relevance with the administrations and industry readiness in each country. Future steps include enhancing the paradigm in order to cover vertical data standards and applying the approach to other EU or associated countries. © Universidad de Talca.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charalabidis, Y., Lampathaki, F., & Askounis, D. (2008). Unified Data Modelling and Document Standardization Using Core Components Technical Specification for Electronic Government Applications. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762008000200004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free