Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

126Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Many patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) complain of significant fatigue. To date, no instrument to measure fatigue has been validated in a US inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population. Aim To determine the reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale in IBD. Methods A total of 209 patients with IBD completed the 13 items of the FACIT-F, alongside laboratory testing and disease activity assessment. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha; test-retest reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); validity by the correlation of the FACIT-F score with C-reactive protein (CRP) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), haematocrit (HCT) and disease activity as measured by the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI; CD) and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI; UC). Results The mean ± SD FACIT-F score was 38.9 ± 11.0 overall (CD 38.6 ± 11.3; UC 39.4 ± 10.6). Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. The ICC for first and repeat FACIT-F scores assessed within 180 days without change in disease state was 0.81 (CD 0.78; UC 0.87). FACIT-F scores were lower in patients with active symptoms (CD 4.6 points, 95% CI 2.4-6.9, P < 0.001; UC 8.5 points, 95% CI 5.5-11.4, P < 0.001). In UC, FACIT-F scores were correlated with ESR (-0.76, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.50), CRP (-0.72, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.43) and HCT (0.53, 95% CI 0.22-0.74). Conclusion The FACIT-F scale is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring fatigue in IBD. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tinsley, A., MacKlin, E. A., Korzenik, J. R., & Sands, B. E. (2011). Validation of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 34(11–12), 1328–1336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04871.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free