'Good' and 'Bad' democracies: How to conduct research into the quality of democracy

57Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The analysis of the quality of democracy requires a joint definition of democratic quality- that is, a definition of 'good' and 'bad' democracies. Its complex nature necessitates the introduction of five principal dimensions - the rule of law, accountability, responsiveness, freedom and equality/solidarity - for empirical definition of the democratic quality and, more importantly, for the identification of the factors that subvert the democratic balance in old and new regimes. This analytical framework differs from other studies by advancing the importance of combining both quantitative and qualitative measures in studying the quality of democracy. © 2004 Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morlino, L. (2004). “Good” and “Bad” democracies: How to conduct research into the quality of democracy. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270410001687082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free