The sensitivity of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus assay in Zambian adults with active tuberculosis

52Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

S E T T I N G A N D Objective: To investigate the sensitivity of the new interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), for active TB (used as a surrogate for latent tuberculous infection) in a Zambian TB clinic. Design: Consecutive smear or Xpert® MTB/RIFpositive adult (age ≥18 years) pulmonary TB patients were recruited between June 2015 and March 2016. Venous blood was tested using QFT-Plus. The sensitivity was defined as the number positive divided by the total number tested. Using logistic regression, factors associated with positive QFT-Plus results were explored. Results: Of 108 patients (median age 32 years, interquartile range 27-38; 73% male; 63% human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] positive), 90 were QFTPlus-positive, 11 were negative and seven had indeterminate results; sensitivity was 83% (95%CI 75-90). There was no difference in sensitivity by HIV status (HIV-positive 85%, 95%CI 75-93; n = 68 vs. HIVnegative 80%, 95%CI 64-91; n = 40; P = 0.59). In models adjusted for age alone, CD4 cell count <100 cells/ll (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.02-0.96; P=0.05) and body mass index <18.5 kg/m2 (OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.08-0.91; P = 0.02) were associated with decreased odds of positive QFT-Plus results. Conclusion: Overall, the sensitivity of QFT-Plus is similar to that of the tuberculin skin test and other IGRAs. While overall sensitivity is not affected by HIV status, QFT-Plus sensitivity was lower among people living with HIV/acquired immune-deficiency syndrome with severe immunosuppression.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Telisinghe, L., Amofa-Sekyi, M., Maluzi, K., Kaluba-Milimo, D., Cheeba-Lengwe, M., Chiwele, K., … Ayles, H. (2017). The sensitivity of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus assay in Zambian adults with active tuberculosis. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 21(6), 690–696. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.16.0764

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free