Measurement equivalence of a concise customer engagement metric across country, language, and customer types

4Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The establishment of measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) across groups is a precondition to conducting any cross-group comparisons; otherwise, one could not know for sure whether the observed between-group difference is due to real differences among the constructs of interest or to differences in how they are measured. However, many multinational corporations (MNCs) actually measure and compare results of customer surveys across groups defined by countries, languages, or between Business-to-Business (B2B) and Business-to-Consumer (B2C) customers without first testing ME/I. In this article, we illustrate how to apply multiple statistical techniques to investigate ME/I, plus we evaluate both construct equivalence and differential item functioning (DIF). We hope that illustrating how such analyses can be done with relative ease may encourage more practitioners to perform ME/I as a routine practice rather than an exception.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, D., & Yang, Y. (2015). Measurement equivalence of a concise customer engagement metric across country, language, and customer types. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79(S1), 325–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free