A Comparison of Corona-Treated and Flame-Treated Polypropylene Films

192Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The comparison of corona-treated and flame-treated polypropylene (PP) films provides insight into the mechanism of these surface-oxidation processes. Atomic force microscopy (AFM), contact-angle measurements, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS or ESCA) were used to characterize surface-treated biaxially oriented PP. While both processes oxidize the PP surface, corona treatment leads to the formation of water-soluble low-molecular-weight oxidized materials (LMWOM), while flame treatment does not. Computational modeling of the gas-phase chemistry in an air corona was performed using a zero-dimensional plasma-chemistry model. The modeling results indicate that the ratio of O to OH is much higher in a corona discharge than in a flame. Chain scission and the formation of LMWOM are associated with reactions involving O atoms. The higher ratios of O to OH in a corona are more conducive to LMWOM production. Surface-oxidized PP exhibits considerable thermodynamic contact-angle hysteresis that is primarily caused by microscopic chemical heterogeneity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strobel, M., Jones, V., Lyons, C. S., Ulsh, M., Kushner, M. J., Dorai, R., & Branch, M. C. (2003). A Comparison of Corona-Treated and Flame-Treated Polypropylene Films. Plasmas and Polymers, 8(1), 61–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022817909276

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free