Abstract
This original version of this Article contained errors. In the legend of Figure 2, “Shown are the values from the 18s (red) and COI (green) eDNA qPCR quantification and total DNA (blue) from the Qbit quantification.” now reads: “Shown are the values from the 18s (blue) and COI (orange) eDNA qPCR quantification and total DNA (black) from the Qbit quantification.” In the legend of Figure 3, “Exponential decay fits (lines) and individual sample copy numbers (points) for 18S (solid lines, open points) and COI (dotted lines, black points) for 0.2 μm (orange line, circles) and water effluent (blue line, triangles) from time 0 to day 6.” now reads: “Logarithmic curve fits (lines) and individual sample copy numbers (points) for 18S (solid lines, open points) and COI (dotted lines, black points) for 0.2 μm (orange line, circles) and water effluent (blue line, triangles) from time 0 to day 6.” In Table 4, the third column heading, “Sequence (3′ to 5′)”. now reads: "Sequence (5′ to 3′)”. The original Article has been corrected.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Moushomi, R., Wilgar, G., Carvalho, G., Creer, S., & Seymour, M. (2021, December 1). Author Correction: Environmental DNA size sorting and degradation experiment indicates the state of Daphnia magna mitochondrial and nuclear eDNA is subcellular (Scientific Reports, (2019), 9, 1, (12500), 10.1038/s41598-019-48984-7). Scientific Reports. Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95567-6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.