Morphology of locomotor appendages in Arachnida: evolutionary trends and phylogenetic implications

97Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The morphological diversity of locomotor appendages in Arachnida is surveyed lo reconstruct phylogenetic relationships and discover evolutionary trends in form and function. The appendicular skeleton and musculature of representatives from the ten living arachnid orders ate described, and a system of homology is proposed. Character polarities are established through comparison with an outgroup. Limulus polyphemus Xiphosura). Cladistic analysis suggests that Arachnida is monophyletic and that absence of extensor muscles is a primitive condition. Extensors are primitively absent in Araneae. Amblypygi, Uropygi, Palpigradi, Ricinulei and Acari. Most similarities in the appendages of these orders are symplesiomorphic so that phylogenetic relationships among the ‘extensorless’ groups cannot be resolved solely on the basis of appendicular characters. Extensor muscles appear to have evolved once, and their presence is considered a synapomorphic feature of Opiliones, Scorpiones, Pseudoscorpiones and Solifugae. Solifugae lack extensors, but a parsimonious interpretation of other characters indicates that this is a secondary, derived condition. The phylogenetic relationships among these four orders are clarified by modifications of the patellotibial joint. Cladistic analysis indicates that Opiliones may be the sister group of the other three orders and that Scorpiones is the sister group of Pseudoscorpiones and Solifugae. Conclusions concerning phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary morphology presented here differ substantially from those of earlier studies on the locomotor appendages of Arachnida. Copyright © 1989, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

SHULTZ, J. W. (1989). Morphology of locomotor appendages in Arachnida: evolutionary trends and phylogenetic implications. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 97(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1989.tb00552.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free