Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents

30Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We performed a prospective study to compare the Etest and the microdilution method (NCCLS guidelines) for determining the MICs of fluconazole, itraconazole, flucytosine and amphotericin B for 35 strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. For the microdilution method (MDM) RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose was used for fluconazole, itraconazole and flucytosine, and Antibiotic Medium 3 for amphotericin B. For the Etest, RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose and solidified with 1.5% agar was used for the four antifungal agents. Amphotericin B was also tested on Antibiotic Medium 3 solidified with 1.5% agar. Fluconazole and flucytosine MICs by the Etest showed good correlation with the broth MDM (81.1 and 89.2% agreement within two dilutions, respectively). With the tested population of itraconazole- and amphotericin B-susceptible isolates, the MIC agreement for itraconazole was 54%; amphotericin B showed the lowest agreement (8.1% on Antibiotic Medium 3 and 13.5% on RPMI).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aller, A. I., Martin-Mazuelos, E., Gutierrez, M. J., Bernal, S., Chavez, M., & Recio, F. J. (2000). Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 46(6), 997–1000. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/46.6.997

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free