Abstract
Objective. The prognosis of large-vessel GCA (LV-GCA) has not yet been investigated. How does it compare to GCA without arm vasculitis (GCA controls)? Methods. Charts of 53 LV-GCA patients and 53 GCA controls were reviewed following a predetermined protocol. Telephone interviews of patients or their primary care physicians were conducted. Forty LV-GCA patients underwent follow-up duplex ultrasound examinations of proximal arm arteries. Results. The mean observation time was 50 (s.d. ± 31) months. None of the LV-GCA patients developed ischaemic arm complications. In 30%, proximal arm artery wall swelling disappeared completely. It decreased in 53%. In 8% it remained unchanged, in 5% it increased and in 5% arteries occluded with collateral flow. After the start of treatment, anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy developed neither in LV-GCA patients nor in GCA controls, amaurosis fugax occurred in 4 and 6%, arterial hypertension in 53 and 66%, strokes in 9 and 9%, myocardial infarction in 2 and 2%, diabetes mellitus in 30 and 25%, osteoporosis in 38 and 23%, and osteoporotic fractures in 15 and 4%, respectively. Mean corticosteroid dose was 3.7 mg/day. Mean duration of therapy was 42 months. All differences were insignificant. Four LV-GCA patients developed vasculitic popliteal artery stenoses. Conclusions. The prognosis of LV-GCA is benign with regard to ischaemic complications. Proximal artery wall swelling decreases in most cases. Its course is similar to GCA without proximal arm arteritis. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schmidt, W. A., Moll, A., Seifert, A., Schicke, B., Gromnica-Ihle, E., & Krause, A. (2008). Prognosis of large-vessel giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology, 47(9), 1406–1408. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken258
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.