Abstract
This paper compares two working file servers in terms of their design goals, implementation issues, performance, and service experience. One server, the Xerox Distributed File System (XDFS) [10], was built at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center; the other, the Cambridge File Server (CFS) [2, 3, 4], was built at the Cambridge University Computer Laboratory. Both file servers support concurrent random access to files over a network, and each offers an atomic transaction mechanism covering modifications to files.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Mitchell, J. G., & Dion, J. (1981). A comparison of two network-based file servers: Summary. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, SOSP 1981 (pp. 45–46). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/800216.806590
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
