Refractive Errors and Concomitant Strabismus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

47Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the risk of development of concomitant strabismus due to refractive errors. Eligible studies published from 1946 to April 1, 2016 were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE that evaluated any kinds of refractive errors (myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism and anisometropia) as an independent factor for concomitant exotropia and concomitant esotropia. Totally 5065 published records were retrieved for screening, 157 of them eligible for detailed evaluation. Finally 7 population-based studies involving 23,541 study subjects met our criteria for meta-analysis. The combined OR showed that myopia was a risk factor for exotropia (OR: 5.23, P = 0.0001). We found hyperopia had a dose-related effect for esotropia (OR for a spherical equivalent [SE] of 2-3 diopters [D]: 10.16, P = 0.01; OR for an SE of 3-4D: 17.83, P < 0.0001; OR for an SE of 4-5D: 41.01, P < 0.0001; OR for an SE of ≥5D: 162.68, P < 0.0001). Sensitivity analysis indicated our results were robust. Results of this study confirmed myopia as a risk for concomitant exotropia and identified a dose-related effect for hyperopia as a risk of concomitant esotropia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, S. M., Chan, R. Y. T., Bin Lin, S., Rong, S. S., Lau, H. H. W., Lau, W. W. Y., … Yam, J. C. S. (2016). Refractive Errors and Concomitant Strabismus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free