Interstitial fibrosis: Tubular hypothesis versus glomerular hypothesis

28Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pathogenesis of renal interstitial fibrosis leading eventually to renal failure is highly debatable. Whereas the so-called tubular hypothesis, involving an increased tubular uptake of potentially toxic substances that induce a variety of cytokines, growth factors, and profibrogenic factors, is based to a large extent on cell-culture studies, the glomerular hypothesis is based mainly on careful morphological observations. Unraveling the pathways appears to be extremely complex, but in vivo studies appear to offer the most reliable results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christensen, E. I., & Verroust, P. J. (2008). Interstitial fibrosis: Tubular hypothesis versus glomerular hypothesis. Kidney International. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2008.421

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free