Playful personnel selection: The use of traditional versus game-related personnel selection methods and their perception from the recruiters’ and applicants’ perspectives

10Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Game-related assessments (GRAs) are increasingly gaining interest in practice and research. However, little is known about how recruiters view these methods. This study examined recruiters’ (N = 158) reasons for using GRAs, the influence of their characteristics on their use of these methods, and recruiters’ perceptions of GRAs compared to those of potential applicants (N = 144). Results indicated that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, innovativeness in IT, and video game pursuit partly explained recruiters’ intentions to use GRAs, which then predicted actual usage. The expected positive impact on the organizational image and applicant reactions were among the most important reasons for using GRAs. Recruiters and potential applicants perceived GRAs as more enjoyable and modern than traditional assessment methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohlms, M. L., Melchers, K. G., & Kanning, U. P. (2024). Playful personnel selection: The use of traditional versus game-related personnel selection methods and their perception from the recruiters’ and applicants’ perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 32(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12466

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free