Determinants of the Distance Covered During a Six-Minute Walk Test in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of the functional capacity of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) by means of the distance covered in the six-minute walk test (6MWT) has assumed great importance, since the 6MWD is a predictor of mortality and hospitalization in this population, however the determinants of better distance traveled in patients with HF are little explored, especially in the Brazilian population. Objective: To evaluate the determinants of 6MWD in patients with chronic HF. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with 81 HF patients in outpatient treatment. 6MWD was used as the outcome variable and sociodemographic, clinical, physical-functional and emotional data were submitted to multiple regression analysis using the stepwise method with a significance level of 5%. Results: Mean age of participants was 56.71 years; the 6MWD showed a bivariate correlation with age (r=-0.27, p=0.01), maximal inspiratory pressure (r=0.42, p<0.01), maximal expiratory pressure (r=0.36, p<0.01), handgrip strength (r=0.38, p<0.01), Borg scale (-0.22, p=0.04), Charlson index (r=-0.25, p=0.02) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale (r=-0.42, p<0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the variables gender (p=0.001), age (0.004), forced vital capacity (FVC) (p=0.016) and mMRC (p=0.001) simultaneously explained 37% of variance in the 6MWD. Conclusion: Higher levels of dyspnea on daily life activities, female sex, older age and lower forced vital capacity are determinants of a shorter 6MWD in patients with chronic HF. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2019;32(2)134-142)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Morais, E. R., & Rassi, S. (2019). Determinants of the Distance Covered During a Six-Minute Walk Test in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences, 32(2), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.5935/2359-4802.20180088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free