Obstetric outcome in patients with rheumatic heart disease: experience of a tertiary hospital.

  • Sharma Koirala P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Pregnancy in patients with rheumatic heart disease has always been challenging. Haemodynamic changes in pregnancy with diseased heart may cause adverse maternal and fetal outcome.Methods: A prospective study was done in pregnant women with rheumatic heart disease over a period of 2 years from 2015 to 2016 at Tribhuwan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu. Baseline data collected at antenatal period were analyzed with obstetric outcomes.Results: A total of 85 women were enrolled in this study. Sixty percent of the women were primigravida. Mitral stenosis was the commonest lesion (69.41%), followed by mitral regurgitation (25.88%) and aortic stenosis (4.71%). Cardiac events were noted in 32 patients out of which 11 developed pulmonary oedema and 6 had new onset of atrial fibrillation. Vaginal delivery (58.82%) was the commonest mode of delivery followed by cesarean section (24.7%). Eighty percent of women remained in NYHA functional class I and II, whereas 20% had deterioration of functional class. There were more maternal and fetal complications in women with NYHA III or IV in comparison to women with NYHA I or II. Low birth weight infants were found in 37.64% of cases. There was one maternal death in a lady with severe mitral stenosis with moderate mitral regurgitation due to congestive heart failure at 34 weeks of gestation. There were 8 fetal and 11 neonatal deathConclusions: Functional cardiac status during pregnancy has a major impact on maternal and fetal outcome. Rheumatic heart disease diagnosed before pregnancy may improve the outcome.Nepalese Heart Journal 2017; 14(2): 31-34

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharma Koirala, P. (2017). Obstetric outcome in patients with rheumatic heart disease: experience of a tertiary hospital. Nepalese Heart Journal, 14(2), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.3126/njh.v14i2.18500

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free