Statistical issues and analyses of in vivo and in vitro genomic data in order to identify clinically relevant profiles

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In vitro experimentation provides a convenient controlled environment for testing biological hypotheses of functional genomics in cancer induction and progression. However, it is necessary to validate resulting gene signatures from these in vitro experiments in human tumor samples (i.e. in vivo). We discuss the several methods for integrating data from these two sources paying particular attention to formulating statistical tests and corresponding null hypotheses. We propose a classification null hypothesis that can be simply modeled via permutation testing. A classification method is proposed based upon the Tissue Similarity Index of Sandberg and Ernberg (PNAS, 2005) that uses the classification null hypothesis. This method is demonstrated using the in vitro signature of Core Serum Response developed by Chang et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poisson, L. M., & Ghosh, D. (2007). Statistical issues and analyses of in vivo and in vitro genomic data in order to identify clinically relevant profiles. Cancer Informatics, 3, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693510700300008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free