22Na influx is significantly lower in salt tolerant groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) varieties

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Distinct varieties differing in salt tolerance were initially identified from two separate green house experiments using two systems; solution as well as soil culture. The first screening involved a diverse group of 27 cultivars. Several physiological traits; Chlorophyll Stability Index (CSI), Salt Tolerance Index (STI) and ion content were determined to screen the cultivars for differences in salt tolerance using solution culture in the first experiment. A set of six varieties (three tolerant and three susceptible) were selected from this experiment and then subjected again to salt stress adopting a natural soil system in the second experiment which involved a screening approach essentially similar to that of the first experiment. In the third experiment using two distinct cultivars differing in salt tolerance selected from experiment II, 22Na influx rate was determined in the root and shoot at the end of a 24 h salt imposition in Hoagland's nutrient system containing 180 KBq of 22Na. The results suggested that there were distinct differences in 22Na influx rate into root and concurrently in the shoot. The salt tolerant Spanish improved and one of the moderately tolerant Trombay variety TAG 24, showed good regulation of 22Na influx resulting in low 22Na concentration. The salt susceptible variety JSP39 had nearly 7-8 fold higher root 22Na content as compared to the tolerant and moderately tolerant cultivars. The results have highlighted the importance of Na exclusion as an important determinant of salt tolerance in groundnut. © 2013 Prof. H.S. Srivastava Foundation for Science and Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smitharani, J. A., Sowmyashree, M. L., Vasantha, K. M., Srivastava, M., & Sashidhar, V. R. (2014). 22Na influx is significantly lower in salt tolerant groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) varieties. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 20(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-013-0202-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free