Open innovation for phenotypic drug discovery: The PD 2 assay panel

54Citations
Citations of this article
146Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Phenotypic lead generation strategies seek to identify compounds that modulate complex, physiologically relevant systems, an approach that is complementary to traditional, target-directed strategies. Unlike gene-specific assays, phenotypic assays interrogate multiple molecular targets and signaling pathways in a target "agnostic" fashion, which may reveal novel functions for well-studied proteins and discover new pathways of therapeutic value. Significantly, existing compound libraries may not have sufficient chemical diversity to fully leverage a phenotypic strategy. To address this issue, Eli Lilly and Company launched the Phenotypic Drug Discovery Initiative (PD 2), a model of open innovation whereby external research groups can submit compounds for testing in a panel of Lilly phenotypic assays. This communication describes the statistical validation, operations, and initial screening results from the first PD 2 assay panel. Analysis of PD 2 submissions indicates that chemical diversity from open source collaborations complements internal sources. Screening results for the first 4691 compounds submitted to PD 2 have confirmed hit rates from 1.6% to 10%, with the majority of active compounds exhibiting acceptable potency and selectivity. Phenotypic lead generation strategies, in conjunction with novel chemical diversity obtained via open-source initiatives such as PD 2, may provide a means to identify compounds that modulate biology by novel mechanisms and expand the innovation potential of drug discovery. © 2011 Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, J. A., Chu, S., Willard, F. S., Cox, K. L., Sells Galvin, R. J., Peery, R. B., … Moxham, C. M. (2011). Open innovation for phenotypic drug discovery: The PD 2 assay panel. Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 16(6), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057111405379

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free