Wearable heart rate variability and atrial fibrillation monitoring to improve clinically relevant endpoints in cardiac surgery —a systematic review

11Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aims to highlight the untapped potential of heart rate variability (HRV) and atrial fibrillation (AF) monitoring by wearable health monitoring devices as a critical diagnostic tool in cardiac surgery (CS) patients. We reviewed established predictive capabilities of HRV and AF monitoring in specific cardiosurgical scenarios and provide a perspective on additional predictive properties of wearable health monitoring devices that need to be investigated. Methods: After screening most relevant databases, we included 33 publications in this review. Perusing these publications on HRV’s prognostic value, we could identify HRV as a predictor for sudden cardiac death, mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and post operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). With regards to standard AF assessment, which typically includes extensive periods of unrecorded cardiac activity, we demonstrated that continuous monitoring via wearables recorded significant cardiac events that would otherwise have been missed. Results: Photoplethysmography and single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) were identified as the most useful and convenient technical assessment modalities, and their advantages and disadvantages were described in detail. As a call to further action, we observed that the scientific community has relatively extensively explored wearable AF screening, whereas HRV assessment to improve relevant clinical outcomes in CS is rarely studied; it still has great potential to be leveraged. Conclusions: Therefore, risk assessment in CS would benefit greatly from earlier preoperative and postoperative AF detection, comprehensive and accurate assessment of cardiac health through HRV metrics, and continuous long-term monitoring. These should be achievable via commercially available wearables.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zillner, L., Andreas, M., & Mach, M. (2024). Wearable heart rate variability and atrial fibrillation monitoring to improve clinically relevant endpoints in cardiac surgery —a systematic review. MHealth, 10. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-23-19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free