Using Plastic Wastes to Exemplify Justice Dimensions of Extended Producer Responsibility

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) places liability, physical, financial, and/or informative responsibility for a product throughout its life cycle on its producer. Implementing such schemes is expected to result in many environmental and social benefits. Yet, academic and practitioner discussions on the mechanisms focus on environmental impacts, whereas social dimensions of EPR are often side-lined. This short communication contributes to addressing this gap by establishing a research agenda for the justice dimensions of EPR. For this purpose, initial links between EPR and justice – specifically waste colonialism, procedural justice, recognition justice, distributive justice, intra-and intergenerational equity, waste justice, and corrective justice – are set out, including where it affects products in their life cycles and examples of which stakeholders may be impacted, with plastic waste used to provide examples.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steenmans, K., & Malcolm, R. (2023). Using Plastic Wastes to Exemplify Justice Dimensions of Extended Producer Responsibility. Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2301024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free