In this study, the purpose is to describe advanced students’ motivational status to learn Nature of Science (NOS) and their understandings on NOS by using Ranking Questionnaire for “interest” and “importance” and modifi ed version of Views on Nature of Science Questionnaire. The results indicated that the participants did not see NOS as an important sub- ject compared to mathematics, science and social science subjects. Moreover, the participants were more interested in mathematics and science subjects than in NOS subject. The results on NOS understandings also showed that the participants were transitional in terms of “evidence and observation based science” and “subjectivity” while they had informed understandings on “place of imagination and creativity in science”. They were also naïve in terms of “existence of one method in science”, “no hierarchy between theory and law”, “tentativeness” and “diff erence between observation and inference”. The results explained an important motiva- tional problem to implement any NOS teaching methods to change misunder- standings
CITATION STYLE
Serdar Koksal, M., & Tunc Sahin, C. (2013). Understandings of Graduate Students on Nature of Science. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(4), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.04.06
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.