Immunoenzymetric assay for creatine kinase MB with subunit-specific monoclonal antibodies compared with an immunochemical method and electrophoresis

38Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Results of an immunoenzymetric assay (TANDEM®-E CKMB) for creatine kinase (CK; EC 2.7.3.2) MB isoenzyme, in which subunit-specific monoclonal antibodies are used, were compared with those by an immunochemical method [Isomune-CK(TM)] and electrophoresis (Corning agarose gel). The study involved 200 patients; > 500 samples were analyzed by all three methods. The analytical performances were acceptable. Between-method correlation coefficients ranged from 0.881 to 0.975. Two reference intervals were established for the immunoassays: 0-4 μg/L (TANDEM) and 0-4 U/L (Isomune) for 'normal' patients; 0-9 μg/L (TANDEM) and 0-14 U/L (Isomune) for noninfarct patients. Agreement with respect to increased CK-MB as defined by the reference intervals for the noninfarct patient was 96% between TANDEM and electrophoresis, 90% between Isomune and electrophoresis. All three methods are acceptable for use in determining CK-MB, but the overall diagnostic efficiencies for the mass or activity concentration of the isoenzyme and for its proportion of total CK activity, based on the predictive value model, are 92% (electrophoresis, 0-7 U/L), 90% (electrophoresis, 0-4%), 92% (TANDEM, 0-9 μg/L), 88% (TANDEM, 0-3% index), 88% (Isomune, 0-14 U/L), and 83% (Isomune, 0-4%). All three methods can detect CK-MB in serum, but its presence is not necessarily diagnostic of acute infarct. We recommend using the actual concentration of CK-MB to evaluate patients with suspected acute myocardial infarct, and the percentage of CK-MB when total CK is very high.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, D. W., Taylor, E., Frye, R., & Blitzer, R. L. (1985). Immunoenzymetric assay for creatine kinase MB with subunit-specific monoclonal antibodies compared with an immunochemical method and electrophoresis. Clinical Chemistry, 31(3), 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/31.3.465

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free