How - Anti- ing ' becomes Mastery: Moral Subjectivities Shaped through Anti-Oppressive Practice

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Anti-oppressive practice (AOP) has been popularly adopted in the undergraduate and graduate levels as a dominant framework for theorising about oppression, the self and working towards change. It is conceptualised as the socially just framework to practise from when engaging racialised and marginalised populations. Using a post-structural Foucauldian analysis, I intend to examine the discursive effects of AOP as occupying a position of mastery. Specifically, the active process of - anti-ing' is a way of governing the self which becomes a form of currency when it is taken up as a dominant discourse. Looking at three tenets of AOP theory relating to identity, authenticity and resistance, I suggest that AOP can operate to re-inscribe a normalcy that relies on the construction of a moral subjectivity, effectively obscuring the types of work that are required to modify and regulate oneself when performing - anti-ing'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, H. (2018, January 1). How - Anti- ing ’ becomes Mastery: Moral Subjectivities Shaped through Anti-Oppressive Practice. British Journal of Social Work. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free