Non-invasive assessment of microcirculation by sidestream dark field imaging as a marker of coronary artery disease in diabetes

29Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: In diabetes, generalised microvascular disease and coronary artery disease (CAD) are likely to occur in parallel. We used a sidestream dark field (SDF) handheld imaging device to determine the relation between the labial microcirculation parameters and CAD in asymptomatic patients with diabetes. Methods: SDF imaging was validated for assessment of labial capillary density and tortuosity. Thereafter, mean labial capillary density and tortuosity were evaluated and compared in non-diabetic controls, and in asymptomatic patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In diabetic patients, mean capillary density and tortuosity were compared according to the presence of CAD. Results: Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes were associated with increased capillary density and tortuosity. In diabetes, mean capillary density was an independent predictor of elevated coronary artery calcium (CAC) (p = 0.03) and obstructive CAD on computed tomography angiography (p = 0.01). Using a cut-off mean capillary density of 24.9 (per 0.63 mm2) the negative predictive value was 84% and 89% for elevated CAC and obstructive CAD. Likewise, capillary tortuosity was an independent predictor of increased CAC (p = 0.01) and obstructive CAD (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Assessment of labial microcirculation parameters using SDF imaging is feasible and conveys the potential to estimate vascular morbidity in patients with diabetes, at bedside. © The Author(s) 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Djaberi, R., Schuijf, J. D., De Koning, E. J., Wijewickrama, D. C., Pereira, A. M., Smit, J. W., … Jukema, J. W. (2013). Non-invasive assessment of microcirculation by sidestream dark field imaging as a marker of coronary artery disease in diabetes. Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, 10(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164112446302

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free