Situating the Debate on Geometrical Algebra within the Framework of Premodern Algebra

Abstract

Argument The aim of this paper is to employ the newly contextualized historiographical category of premodern algebra in order to revisit the arguably most controversial topic of the last decades in the field of Greek mathematics, namely the debate on geometrical algebra. Within this framework, we shift focus from the discrepancy among the views expressed in the debate to some of the historiographical assumptions and methodological approaches that the opposing sides shared. Moreover, by using a series of propositions related to Elem. II.5 as a case study, we discuss Euclid's geometrical proofs, the so-called semi-algebraic alternative demonstrations attributed to Heron of Alexandria, as well as the solutions given by Diophantus, al-Sulamī, and al-Khwārizmī to the corresponding numerical problem. This comparative analysis offers a new reading of Heron's practice, highlights the significance of contextualizing premodern algebra, and indicates that the origins of algebraic reasoning should be sought in the problem-solving practice, rather than in the theorem-proving tradition.