Abstract
We show simple constant-round interactive proof systems for problems capturing the approximability, to within a factor of √n, of optimization problems in integer lattices, specifically, the closest vector problem (CVP) and the shortest vector problem (SVP). These interactive proofs are for the coNP direction; that is, we give an interactive protocol showing that a vector is far from the lattice (for CVP) and an interactive protocol showing that the shortest-lattice-vector is long (for SVP). Furthermore, these interactive proof systems are honest-verifier perfect zero-knowledge. We conclude that approximating CVP (resp., SVP) within a factor of √n is in NP intersection co AM. Thus, it seems unlikely that approximating these problems to within a √n factor is NP-hard. Previously, for the CVP (resp., SVP) problem, Lagarias et al. (1990, Combinatorica 10, 333-348), Hastad (1988, Combinatorica 8, 75-81), and Banaszczyk (1993, Math. Annal. 296, 625-635) showed that the gap problem corresponding to approximating CVP (resp., SVP) within n is in NP intersection co NP. On the other hand, Arora et al. (1997, J. Comput. System Sci. 54, 317-331) showed that the gap problem corresponding to approximating CVP within 2log(0.999)n is quasi-NP-hard.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Goldreich, O., & Goldwasser, S. (2000). On the limits of nonapproximability of lattice problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 60(3), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1999.1686
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.