Combination phase I study of nedaplatin and gemcitabine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

21Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To establish the toxicities and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of nedaplatin with gemcitabine, and to observe their antitumour activity, we conducted a combination phase I study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received nedaplatin (60-100 mg m-2 given intravenously over 90 min) on day 1, and gemcitabine (800-1000 mg m-2 given intravenously over 30 min) on days 1, 8, every 3 weeks. In total, 20 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received no prior chemotherapy or one previous chemotherapy regimen were enrolled. The most frequent toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia; nonhaematological toxicities were generally mild. Three out of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and delayed anaemia) at dose level 4, 100 mg m-2 nedaplatin with 1000 mg m-2 gemcitabine, which was regarded as the MTD. There were three partial responses, for an overall response rate of 16.7%. The median survival time and 1-year survival rate were 9.1 months and 34.1%, respectively. This combination is well tolerated and active for advanced NSCLC. The recommended dose is 80 mg m-2 nedaplatin with 1000 mg m-2 gemcitabine. This combination chemotherapy warrants a phase II study and further evaluation in prospective randomised trials with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based combinations as first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. British Journal of Cancer (2004) 90, 2092-2096. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601817 www.bjcancer.com Published online 20 April 2004 © 2004 Cancer Research UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurata, T., Tamura, K., Yamamoto, N., Nogami, T., Satoh, T., Kaneda, H., … Fukuoka, M. (2004). Combination phase I study of nedaplatin and gemcitabine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 90(11), 2092–2096. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free