Spatial Inferences in Narrative Comprehension: the Role of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During the comprehension of narrative texts, readers keep a mental representation of the location of protagonists and objects; a breach in spatial coherence is detected by longer online reading times (consistency effect). We addressed whether these spatial inferences involve verbal or spatial working memory in two experiments, combining the consistency paradigm with selective verbal and spatial working memory concurrent tasks. The first experiment found longer reading times with a concurrent spatial task under imagery instructions (t33 = 2.87, p =.021). The second experiment, under comprehension reading instructions, found effects of verbal interference on reading times and accuracy. With a verbal secondary task, reading times for the target sentence were shorter (t45 = 3.60, p =.004) and the error rate was significantly higher (t47 = 2.95, p =.005) than without interference. This pattern of results suggests that spatial inferences in narrative comprehension rely mainly on verbal resources, and spatial working memory resources are recruited when imagery is required.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Irrazabal, N., & Burin, D. (2016). Spatial Inferences in Narrative Comprehension: the Role of Verbal and Spatial Working Memory. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free