Colony Count Accuracy Using Selective Media: Analysts Versus Automatic Colony Counters

  • Guthertz L
  • Fruin J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Using two different methods of counting. a comparison was made of the ability of five analysts to enumerate colonies on selective bacteriologic media. First, analysts manually counted the colonies aided by a Quebec colony counter and a hand tally. This was followed by the counting of colonies on each of three automated colony counters. In this pilot study, the media used included violet red bile agar. KF streptococcal agar, sulfite-polymyxin-sulfariiazine agar, and Standard Methods agar with 2,3,5 triphenyltetrazolium chloride added. The analysts' ability to count colonies on selective media by the manual method was superior to results obtained with the automatic colony counters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guthertz, L. S., & Fruin, J. T. (1979). Colony Count Accuracy Using Selective Media: Analysts Versus Automatic Colony Counters. Journal of Food Protection, 42(5), 420–423. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-42.5.420

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free