Comparison of the multiple-sample means with composite sample results for fecal indicator bacteria by quantitative PCR and culture

8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Few studies have addressed the efficacy of composite sampling for measuring indicator bacteria by quantitative PCR (qPCR). We compared results from composited samples with multiple-sample means for culture- and qPCR-based water quality monitoring. Results from composited samples for both methods were similarly correlated to multiple-sample means and predicted criteria exceedances equally. © 2012, American Society for Microbiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Converse, R. R., Wymer, L. J., Dufour, L. J. W., & Wade, T. J. (2012). Comparison of the multiple-sample means with composite sample results for fecal indicator bacteria by quantitative PCR and culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(19), 7166–7169. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01662-12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free